art, academic and non-fiction books
publishers’ Eastern and Central European representation

Name your list

Log in / Sign in

ta strona jest nieczynna, ale zapraszamy serdecznie na stronę www.obibook.com /// this website is closed but we cordially invite you to visit www.obibook.com

ISBN: PB: 9780972819633

University of Chicago Press, Prickly Paradigm Press

November 2003

87 pp.

17.8x11.4 cm

PB:
£10,00
QTY:

Categories:

What Happened to Art Criticism?

Art criticism was once passionate, polemical, and judgmental; now critics are more often interested in ambiguity, neutrality, and nuanced description. And while art criticism is ubiquitous in newspapers, magazines, and exhibition brochures, it is also virtually absent from academic writing. How is it that even as criticism drifts away from academia, it becomes more academic? How is it that sifting through a countless array of colorful periodicals and catalogs makes criticism seem to slip even further from our grasp? In this pamphlet, James Elkins surveys the last fifty years of art criticism, proposing some interesting explanations for these startling changes.


Contents:

1. Art Criticism: Writing Without Readers

2. How Unified is Art Criticism?
The Catalog Essay
The Academic Treatise
Cultural Criticism
The Conservative Harangue
The Philosopher's Essay
Descriptive Art Criticism
Poetic Art Criticism

3. Seven Unworkable Cures

4. Envoi: What's Good

Acknowledgments

About the Author

James Elkins is the E. C. Chadbourne Professor in the Department of Art History, Theory, and Criticism at the School of the Art Institute of Chicago.

Reviews

"In 'What Happened to Art Criticism?', art historian James Elkins sounds the alarm about the perilous state of that craft, which he believes is 'In worldwide crisis... dissolving into the background clutter of ephemeral cultural criticism' even as more and more people are doing it. 'It's dying, but it's everywhere... massively produced, and massively ignored'. Those who pay attention to other sorts of criticism may recognize the problems Elkins describes: 'Local judgments are preferred to wider ones, and recently judgments themselves have even come to seem inappropriate. In their place critics proffer informal opinions or transitory thoughts, and they shy from strong commitments'. What he'd like to see more of: ambitious judgment, reflection about judgment itself, and 'criticism important enough to count as history, and vice versa'. Amen to that" – Jennifer Howard, Washington Post Book World